But, in actuality, this 174-page “report” has as much value as 174 sheets of bathroom tissue. Why? Because anybody can write anything about anyone and claim it is evidence of a crime.
But if there is to be evidence, then opponents have every right to challenge the alleged evidence in that report. It is called “cross examination.”
Or maybe, old Jack and older Merrick missed those classes in law school. And so did every other Pseudo-Attorney in the media and in the Democrat Party.
Please. Take a seat and STFU, you dumb@$$÷$.
You are an embarrassment to the law if you think this “report” has any merit. And if you have a “law degree” and this is all conclusive, then either you should get your money back or you won your degrees in a bingo raffle.
As reported in the New York Post and elsewhere, Jackie-Boy is saying that there was enough evidence in his report to convict Donald Trump of these crimes, but Smith was quoted to give himself a convenient out.
“The department’s view that the Constitution prohibits the continued indictment and prosecution of a president is categorical and does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the government’s proof or the merits of the prosecution, which the office stands fully behind,” Smith wrote in the report’s conclusion.
“Indeed, but for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the presidency, the office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial,” he added.
Guess Jack and Merrick decided to save face by claiming they “weren’t allowed” to bring it to trial over some rule nobody ever quotes unless they knew they wouldn’t win. That is just a chicken$#!+ excuse to walk away, knowing you would have lost in a real court.
So instead, you submit a report in the dead of night and walk away. Oh what brave jerkweeds you are as you slink away like the snakes you are. Such cowards.
With my apologies to real snakes.
No comments:
Post a Comment