Here is a concept which has been argued since the beginning of our glorious Republic and was framed eloquently in our Sacred Document, the Constitution of the United States, all within the First Amendment; “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof".
Further to this point, Article VI of the Constitution also forbids religious tests for public office.
The separation of church and state is a legal and philosophical doctrine in the US that prevents the government from establishing a religion, favoring one, or interfering with religious practice. Rooted in the First Amendment's Establishment Clause and championed by Thomas Jefferson's "wall of separation" metaphor, it ensures religious freedom and secular governance.
For most of our history, these concepts were honored by most religious member groups. We respected Orthodox Jews, Amish, Black Muslims, Mormons and others who did not force others to conform to their beliefs by taking their worship to the public space.
But since 1962, we have witnessed the erosion to the Judeo-Christian principles which have been the foundation of our country. First, we saw the removal of prayer in public spaces, including our schools (although students have been known to pray before a big test).
Then, we saw nativities and other religious replicas be removed from public spaces since some people were "offended" by the sight of these artifacts.
In recent years, we have seen lawsuits against religious groups and others, due to perceived offenses to secular liberties or agnostic beliefs, across various industries, including bakeries, publications and even certain TV shows.
But ironically, as in Western Europe and elsewhere, there is SILENCE when we see State and Local governments ignoring and/or permitting worship to be be used on public streets and granting permits allowing said worship, even as that form of worship may block public spaces.
Why is this group permitted to stop traffic in order to worship? And why must we be told to be tolerant?
But if we complain, we are called racists and/or Islamophobic.
Isn't that a violation of the government's (whether Federal, State or Local) responsibility NOT to favor the rights of one religion over any other? It seems New York City, and other cities, are certainly violating that premise by allowing Muslims to pray in the streets and on sidewalks.
They should be required to take time to pray in their mosques, as others are required to pray in their churches, temples, synagogues and other places of worship. Or, in their homes or other privately designated place.
As much as we believe in religious freedom, the permission by local governments to overlook a particular religion to practice its "call to prayer", is becoming a public hazard. We continue to watch the "wall of separation" erode which Jefferson so eloquently defined when the Constitution was enacted.
Aa we have witnessed in London, Berlin and other cities, western values have been usurped in a misguided effort to be "more tolerant" to an increasingly powerful and vocal minority. This cannot continue if we want to keep the society we love.
It is time to finally say "enough" or we will lose our right to worship as we please, while we watch governments continue to favor the establishment of a particular religion