Tuesday, November 19, 2024

First Engagement of WWIII?

In February, 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine, I supported the United States response to assist Ukraine to defend itself. At that time, it seemed like the right thing we could do.
 
But by the summer of 2023, after watching our government justify defending Ukraine’s sovereignty and border, while not defending our own, my views began to change.

Then, by the fall, I believed it was a money-grab to launder money, circumventing our own laws in the process. By this time, I believed we needed to stop.

It was announced by the Biden-Harris regime that Biden authorized the use of Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS),deep within Russia. On Sunday, I wrote about it in my commentary entitled, “Are We At DEF-CON 2? and discussed the ramifications, and Vladimir Putin’s potential responses should they be used.

This morning, CNN and other outlets are reporting on Putin’s initial response. And it isn’t withdrawal. Instead, he has authorized a major change in Russsia's nuclear response policy.

The New York Post and others are reporting that Ukraine has engaged the ATACMS system and destroyed a large Russian weapons facility near the town of Karachev, around 70 miles from its border.

An unidentified defense source told RBC-Ukraine that it was a US-supplied Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), which lame-duck President Biden recently gave Ukraine permission to use, sparking threats of World War III.

In my commentary, I said, “Biden may have stumbled us, even unwittingly, into World War III or DEF-CON 1. And as much as I hate to say this, Vice President Harris needs to be placed into the role of Acting President so she can order that mistaken order to stand down.

“Before it is too late.

“And Donald Trump needs to be sworn into office much sooner than January 20 in order to negotiate a peaceful end to all ongoing hostilities in that region.”

When I said this, I was told I was over-emphazing, being over-dramatic and overthinking the issues, the problems and the solutions to avoid a catastrophic outcome.

What say you now?

No comments:

Post a Comment